ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Quantitative evaluation of the central and local community-based home care policy in China based on the PMC Index model.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The community-based home care model is a vital strategy and pivotal response against global population aging. However, multidimensional empirical studies that quantitatively evaluate the design and consistency of community-based home care policies are scarce and have left a critical gap in understanding and optimizing CHC policies. Methods: This research introduces a novel evaluative framework combining text mining and the Policy Modeling Consistency (PMC) index model to quantitatively assess the consistency and design of 30 Chinese CHCPs issued by central and local government from 2021 to 2024. Results: The study yields two key original findings. First, it empirically identifies a core tension in multi-level governance: high longitudinal consistency coexists with significant horizontal disparities in local policy capabilities. Second, it pinpoints deficiencies in policy nature, content, and timeliness as primary constraints. Conclusion: The study's primary theoretical contribution is to present the first empirical and quantitative analysis of CHCPs from a multidimensional level by using the PMC Index model. The primary practical contribution is that through a multidimensional consistency evaluation, the study offers specific, evidence-based optimized pathways for policymakers to enhance policy coherence as well as effectiveness and to bridge the gap between central planning and local implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.