Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41346750›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Medication non-adherence as a driver of pharmaceutical waste: integrating top-down policies with bottom-up practice.

Przemyslaw Kardas, Tamas Agh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Przemyslaw Kardas *Medication Adherence Research Center, Department of Family Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland.
Tamas Agh *Medication Adherence Research Group, Center for Health Technology Assessment and Pharmacoeconomic Research, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medication non-adherence is a widespread challenge affecting up to half of patients with chronic conditions, with profound implications for health outcomes, healthcare costs, and, increasingly recognized, environmental sustainability. Unused and improperly disposed medications contribute to pharmaceutical waste, overproduction, and pollution, amplifying the healthcare sector's carbon footprint. This viewpoint highlights the need for coordinated action across clinical practice and health policy to mitigate this underappreciated dimension of environmental harm. We argue that addressing non-adherence is not solely a clinical imperative but also an ecological one, requiring dual responsibility: bottom-up engagement by healthcare professionals and patients, and top-down strategies embedded in policy and system-level reforms. Drawing on evidence from adherence interventions and sustainable prescribing initiatives, we outline actionable steps-from individualized medication optimization and deprescribing to public health campaigns and regulatory frameworks-to align adherence management with environmental goals. Tackling this problem offers a unique opportunity to improve patient outcomes while advancing climate-conscious healthcare and reducing overall healthcare-related costs. We call on clinicians, health systems, and policymakers to integrate adherence promotion into sustainability agendas and to view every prescription as both a therapeutic and environmental decision. Likewise, we urge optimization of environmentally safe and effective disposal systems for unused and expired drugs, ensuring that such measures become an integral part of comprehensive strategies to protect both human health and the planet.

Indexed as

Health PolicyMedication AdherenceHumansdeprescribingdrug wastageenvironmental impacthealth policymedication adherencemedication optimizationpharmaceutical pollutionsustainable healthcare

Identifiers

PMID41346750
PMCPMC12672469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.