ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Development and validation of an epidemiological risk score for neonatal death in a middle-income country.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- National trends in neonatal diagnoses recorded at hospital discharge in Kazakhstan, 2014-2024.BMJ paediatrics open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Despite global reductions in neonatal mortality, significant disparities remain between regions and population groups. Identifying newborns at higher risk at birth may help direct preventive actions and enhance health planning. Objective: To develop an epidemiological risk score for neonatal death based on individual and contextual factors. Methods: A cohort study was conducted using data from over 5.6 million live births in 645 municipalities of São Paulo State, Brazil, between 2009 and 2018. The outcome was neonatal death. Risk weights were calculated from adjusted odds ratios obtained through multilevel logistic regression, with coefficients transformed using the natural logarithm and scaled from 1 to 10. Internal validation was performed within the cohort; external validation used data from 2008. Results: Points were assigned to congenital anomalies (4, 7, or 10 depending on severity), preterm vaginal birth (4), preterm cesarean (4), birthweight <2,500 g (4), and fewer than seven prenatal visits (3). Conditions assigned 1 point included male sex, maternal age <17 or ≥40 years, term cesarean, birth in spring/summer, multiple pregnancy, low municipal nurse density in public services, and low municipal health insurance coverage. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.83 for internal and 0.81 for external validation. Risk stratification thresholds were proposed based on total points. Conclusion: This score combines routinely collected individual and municipal-level data in Brazil to classify neonatal death risk. It may support clinical prioritization, resource allocation, and identification of low-risk deaths, complementing individualized clinical assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.