Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41346748›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Development and validation of an epidemiological risk score for neonatal death in a middle-income country.

Kelsy N Areco, Paulo Bandiera-Paiva, Rita C X Balda, Daniela T Costa-Nobre, Ana Sílvia Scavacini Marinonio, Adriana Sanudo, Mandira D Kawakami, Milton H Miyoshi, Carina Nunes Vieira E Oliveira, Rosa M V Freitas and 6 more

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Kelsy N ArecoEscola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Paulo Bandiera-PaivaEscola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Rita C X BaldaEscola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Daniela T Costa-NobreEscola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ana Sílvia Scavacini MarinonioEscola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Adriana SanudoEscola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Mandira D KawakamiEscola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Milton H MiyoshiEscola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Carina Nunes Vieira E OliveiraEscola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Rosa M V FreitasFundação Sistema Estadual de Análise de Dados, São Paulo, Brazil.
Monica L P TeixeiraFundação Sistema Estadual de Análise de Dados, São Paulo, Brazil.
Bernadette WaldvogelFundação Sistema Estadual de Análise de Dados, São Paulo, Brazil.
Carlos Roberto V KifferEscola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Maria Fernanda de AlmeidaEscola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ruth GuinsburgEscola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Tulio KonstantynerEscola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Despite global reductions in neonatal mortality, significant disparities remain between regions and population groups. Identifying newborns at higher risk at birth may help direct preventive actions and enhance health planning. Objective: To develop an epidemiological risk score for neonatal death based on individual and contextual factors. Methods: A cohort study was conducted using data from over 5.6 million live births in 645 municipalities of São Paulo State, Brazil, between 2009 and 2018. The outcome was neonatal death. Risk weights were calculated from adjusted odds ratios obtained through multilevel logistic regression, with coefficients transformed using the natural logarithm and scaled from 1 to 10. Internal validation was performed within the cohort; external validation used data from 2008. Results: Points were assigned to congenital anomalies (4, 7, or 10 depending on severity), preterm vaginal birth (4), preterm cesarean (4), birthweight <2,500 g (4), and fewer than seven prenatal visits (3). Conditions assigned 1 point included male sex, maternal age <17 or ≥40 years, term cesarean, birth in spring/summer, multiple pregnancy, low municipal nurse density in public services, and low municipal health insurance coverage. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.83 for internal and 0.81 for external validation. Risk stratification thresholds were proposed based on total points. Conclusion: This score combines routinely collected individual and municipal-level data in Brazil to classify neonatal death risk. It may support clinical prioritization, resource allocation, and identification of low-risk deaths, complementing individualized clinical assessment.

Indexed as

Infant MortalityPerinatal DeathRisk AssessmentAdolescentAdultBrazilCohort StudiesFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInsurance, HealthMaleRegression AnalysisRiskcongenital abnormalitiesdeath certificatesneonatal mortalitypopulation studies in public healthpublic healthrisk scoresecondary health data

Identifiers

PMID41346748
PMCPMC12672502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.