ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2025
Robotic bimanual arm training improves upper limb function in children with hemiparesis: a feasibility study.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In children with hemiparesis, bimanual training can produce greater gains in upper limb function compared with unimanual training of the impaired upper limb. Moreover, repetitive skilled practice is a critical component of effective interventions. The objective of this study was to determine whether upper limb training using a bimanual-to unimanual robotic training device is feasible and effective for improving hand function in children with hemiplegia. We hypothesized that this robotic training would improve motor outcomes on the Assisting Hand Assessment (AHA), the Box and Blocks Test (BBT), and the Jebsen-Taylor Test of Hand Function (JTTHF). Methods: Children ( Results: Although the study was halted by the COVID-19 pandemic, eight children completed 18 training sessions on the BAT (2x/week for 9 weeks). While range of motion did not change significantly, children significantly improved in bimanual (AHA) function. Discussion: Children enjoyed the device, and provided feedback that was used to improve the gaming environment. Further work is needed to determine ideal dosing to optimize improvements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.