Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41346617›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2025

Exploring the anticancer potential of traditional herbs from Tamil Nadu: a narrative review of ethnomedicinal insights and scientific evidence.

Pradeep M K Nair, Ayswarya Rohini Pandian, Vaishali Mathapati, Shobhitha Tantry B, Abhay Sai, Navya Pai, Shanmugam Sudarshan, Manickam Mahalingam, Karishma Silwal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Pradeep M K NairMirakle Integrated Health Centre, Pollachi, India.
Ayswarya Rohini PandianInternational Institute of Yoga and Naturopathy Medical Sciences, Chengalpattu, India.
Vaishali MathapatiSwami Vivekananda Yoga Anusandhana Samsthana, Bengaluru, India.
Shobhitha Tantry BSDM College of Naturopathy and Yogic Sciences, Ujire, India.
Abhay SaiSDM College of Naturopathy and Yogic Sciences, Ujire, India.
Navya PaiSwami Vivekananda Yoga Anusandhana Samsthana, Bengaluru, India.
Shanmugam SudarshanMirakle Integrated Health Centre, Pollachi, India.
Manickam MahalingamMirakle Integrated Health Centre, Pollachi, India.
Karishma SilwalSant Hirdaram Medical College of Naturopathy & Yogic Sciences for Women, Bhopal, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: India, has a rich ethnomedicinal tradition where numerous herbs are used in cancer care. However, scientific validation of these practices remains limited. This narrative review explores the phytochemical mechanisms underlying their anti-cancer effects of 32 herbs identified by herbal activists, including physicians and traditional healers from Tamil Nadu, India, for their purported anticancer properties. Methods: A narrative review was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar to identify studies published between 2014 and January 2025 on 32 selected anecdotal herbs. Eligible studies included Results: Herbs such as Conclusion: Traditional herbs demonstrate notable experimental anticancer potential, yet clinical validation is limited. Integrating ethnomedicinal knowledge with systematic research could guide future cancer therapies and inform policy development in integrative oncology.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicMedicine, TraditionalNeoplasmsPlants, MedicinalAnimalsHumansIndiaAntineoplastic Agents, Phytogenicanticancer herbsethnomedicineherbal medicineintegrative oncologyphytochemicalstraditional medicine

Identifiers

PMID41346617
PMCPMC12672482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.