ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Characteristics and differences in immune response capacity and gut microbiome between wild and captive Amur grayling (
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Endangered species recovery hinges on evaluating captivity-induced shifts in the adaptive traits of candidates slated for reintroduction. Gut microbiota is one such trait and is particularly important for Amur grayling ( Methods: The present study aimed to systematically investigate the differences in intestinal and liver health in Amur grayling from two water environments (wild and captive) by feeding habits, biochemical parameters and 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing. Results: Compared with captive fish, the wild Amur grayling in the liver and gut had higher lysozyme activity ( Discussion: Overall, wild Amur grayling had higher immune capacity and intestinal barrier functions than cultured Amur grayling. This study displayed that responses and adaptations to diverse aquatic environments were shown by liver-gut-microbiota axis in Amur grayling. Our findings could provide a promising direction for the improve its adaptability of wild population in reintroduction project and propose the conservation strategy for biodiversity recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.