Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41346534›Full record

ArticleJournal of the advanced practitioner in oncology2025

Assessment of Standards of Care for Oral Chemotherapy by Pharmacists in Clinical Settings.

Sara Nezirevic, Benyam Muluneh, Jennifer Elston Lafata, Casey Eisinger, Solomea Asfaw, Alison Butts, Karen B Farris, Mallika P Patel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sara NezirevicFrom Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Benyam MulunehEshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Jennifer Elston LafataUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Casey EisingerUNC Medical Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Solomea AsfawWalgreens Pharmacy.
Alison ButtsUK HealthCare, UK College of Pharmacy, Lexington, Kentucky.
Karen B FarrisUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Mallika P PatelThe Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: As oral anticancer agents become more prominent in the treatment landscape, their expanded use may raise concerns, such as nonadherence, adverse events, drug monitoring, and high costs. Clinical pharmacists (CPs) provide patient education and medication management to address these concerns. To understand the services and communication offered, interviews were conducted with clinical pharmacists in oncology clinics. Methods: Telephone interviews were conducted with pharmacists from oncology clinics across the US. The interviews evaluated clinical support services provided by CPs for patients on oral chemotherapy, and facilitators and barriers CPs face in implementing communication with the oncology team. The function and support of CPs in this context were assessed. Results: A total of 16 pharmacists were interviewed. As a result, three overarching themes were identified pertaining to typical roles: (1) CPs provide key support to oncology patients; (2) CPs face logistical, coordination, and communication challenges when supporting oncology patients, and (3) CPs contribute to patient safety and quality of care outside of direct patient care. A total of eight subthemes were identified. Conclusion: CPs provide high-quality care to patients according to national guidelines. However, they continue to be pulled in various directions to fill gaps that exist in the patient care pathway. This leads to pharmacists feeling unsupported, leading to burnout. Many CPs expressed not billing for services provided, making it difficult to advocate for additional supportive resources.

Identifiers

PMID41346534
PMCPMC12673910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.