ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025
Using deep networks for knee range of motion monitoring in total knee arthroplasty rehabilitation.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Knee range of motion (ROM) is a key indicator of rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Current tools, such as visual and protractor measurements, are cumbersome, imprecise, and require professional training, limiting their use in community or home settings. With the rise of smart healthcare, there is a need for a simple, accurate, and low-cost ROM assessment method that reduces healthcare burdens, enables home self-monitoring, and improves rehabilitation outcomes. Methods: A total of 1,103 knee images were collected from 1,790 patients who had undergone TKA. The images were classified into four categories: standard flexion, substandard flexion, standard extension, and substandard extension and six categories: 0°, 25°, 50°, 75°, 100°, and 125°. The images were processed using KROMNet, which was trained with a deep learning architecture that included convolutional, dilated convolution, channel attention layers, and fully connected layers. The model was trained and evaluated using a dataset split into training and test sets, and its performance was assessed with precision, recall, F1-score, and accuracy metrics for both the four-class and six-class tasks. Results: KROMNet achieved an accuracy of 95.02% in the four-class task and 94.12% in the more challenging six-class task. In the four-class task, the precision, recall, and F1-score were 95.04%, 94.96%, and 94.98%, respectively. In the six-class task, KROMNet demonstrated an accuracy of 94.12%, with precision, recall, and F1-scores of 94.64%, 94.59%, and 94.60%, respectively. The model's performance was compared with other state-of-the-art methods, including Hazra's, Du's, Xia's, Victoria's, and Shiwei Liu's models, with KROMNet consistently outperforming these models in both four-class and six-class tasks. Conclusion: The KROMNet model proposed in this study offers an accurate, efficient, cost-effective, and remotely deployable solution for monitoring knee ROM after TKA. KROMNet not only demonstrates superior recognition performance under small sample conditions but also shows strong clinical utility and potential for wider adoption, making it especially suitable for grassroots, community, and home rehabilitation settings. KROMNet is expected to become a key tool in the intelligent rehabilitation system, helping healthcare reduce costs, increase efficiency, and improve patient experience and rehabilitation quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.