ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025
Biomechanical effects of root/cortical bone relation on tooth movement during premolar-extraction space closure with clear aligners: a finite element study.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate the biomechanical effects of varying sagittal root position (SRP), root length (RL), and cortical bone thickness (CBT) on tooth movement and stress distribution during clear aligner therapy (CAT) in extraction cases, using finite element analysis. Methods: Three-dimensional finite element models, including the maxillary alveolar bone, periodontal ligament (PDL), dentition, and clear aligner, were constructed. Groups with varying SRP (labial, middle, and palatal), RL (long, normal, short) and CBT (1 mm, 2 mm) were established. Tooth movement and stress distribution were analyzed for each group after 0.2 mm anterior tooth retraction. Results: Without attachments or additional forces, clear aligners (CAs) resulted in lingual tipping, extrusion, and distal movement of the central incisor in extraction cases. A labially positioned root amplified lingual tipping and torque loss, whereas a palatally positioned root preserved torque but increased posterior anchorage loss; moreover, shorter roots accentuated tipping and generated peak PDL stresses at the cervical and apical regions, while thinner cortical bone resulted in higher stress. Conclusion: SRP and RL significantly affect tooth movement and stress distribution during anterior tooth retraction with CAs in extraction cases, while CBT has minimal impact in tooth movement. The optimal pre-retraction state involves a crown-to-root ratio not exceeding 1.1, with the root positioned upright in the cancellous bone, preventing contact with the labial or palatal cortical bone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.