ReviewAsia Pacific allergy2025
Diagnosis and management of allergic rhinitis: An Indian expert consensus by otorhinolaryngologists.
Review in Asia Pacific allergy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Rational Allergy Practice Guidelines by the Indian Academy of Pediatrics (IAP) and IAP-Allergy and Applied Immunology Chapter.Indian pediatrics · 2026Guideline
- Allergic rhinitis is the strongest independent predictor of obstructive sleep apnea severity in preschool children.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Article
- Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
63 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The prevalence of allergic rhinitis (AR) has increased progressively over the past several years. One of the vital objectives of management of AR is to provide satisfactory symptom control that improves the patient's quality of life. Several classes of drugs, such as antihistamines, intranasal corticosteroids, decongestants, leukotriene receptor antagonists, and immunotherapy, have been developed over the past decades for more effective management of AR. Combinations of pharmacotherapies have also been advocated to treat AR. Objective: To develop clinical practice-relevant consensus statements from experts in the field of otorhinolaryngology after giving due consideration to the real-world clinical dilemmas, current evidence, and preferences of both physicians and patients. Methods: Expert otorhinolaryngologists (n = 61) from India were invited to develop the consensus statements based on the modified Delphi method. Results: Several consensus statements were framed based on evidence from clinical trials and expert insights and experience. One crucial statement was regarding the additional subgrouping of patients with intermittent or persistent AR, or mild, moderate or severe AR into "sneeze-runners" (sneezing, anterior rhinorrhea, itchy nose, and itchy eyes; more sensitization to pollens) and "blockers" (severe nasal blockage and thick nasal mucus which often leads to postnasal drip and breathlessness; higher sensitization to polyvalent house dust, house dust mites and fungi) since they have distinct clinical profiles and different treatment approach. Another critical consensus was on the use of the fixed-dose combination of fluticasone furoate and oxymetazoline hydrochloride nasal spray for the persistent and moderate-severe blocker phenotype of AR. Conclusion: This expert consensus will help physicians in their clinical practice and complement effective diagnosis and management of AR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.