ArticleAsia Pacific allergy2025
The frequency and predictability of switching biologic agents in severe asthma: A real-world perspective.
Article in Asia Pacific allergy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Therapeutic Switching of Biological Drugs in Paediatric Severe Asthma: Experience of a Referral Centre.Biomedicines · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: While phenotyping assists in selecting the right biologic agent for severe asthma, the frequency of patients transitioning to a different biologic is also significant. Objective: We sought to identify the factors that predict switching between biological agents. Methods: The study involved 165 adults with severe asthma and included a 3-year follow-up period. Clinical and spirometric data were evaluated alongside the demographic characteristics of the patients. In addition to skin prick tests and specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) tests, eosinophil counts and total IgE measurements were assessed. Results: The patient group comprised 124 female participants (75%); the average age was 48 ± 13 years. Over half of the patients had eosinophilic asthma (56%) and allergic asthma (52%). In the first-line treatment, 111 patients (68%) were started on omalizumab, 43 patients (26%) on mepolizumab, and 11 patients (6%) on benralizumab. A total of 37 patients required a change in their biologic treatment. The 2 key factors influencing this switch were the initial annual number of asthma attacks and the level of improvement in the asthma control test score assessed during the first evaluation after starting the biologic (odds ratio 2.23 [95% confidence interval: 1.49-3.33]; Conclusion: Patients with higher annual attacks at baseline and lower responsiveness at the first postbiologic efficacy assessment can be useful in predicting switching status. However, further well-designed studies involving a larger number of patients and conducted over a longer term are needed to identify additional factors that could assist in selecting the most appropriate biologic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.