Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41346401›Full record

ArticleACS sustainable chemistry & engineering2025

Closing Data Gaps for LCA of Pharmaceutical Production: Estimating Energy Usage by Upscaling Laboratory Data.

Muhammed Ayaj Ansar, Rosalie van Zelm, Ad M J Ragas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS sustainable chemistry & engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Muhammed Ayaj AnsarDepartment of Environmental Science, Radboud Institute for Biological and Environmental Sciences (RIBES), Radboud University, Heyendaalseweg 135, 6525 AJ Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6968-3254
Rosalie van ZelmDepartment of Environmental Science, Radboud Institute for Biological and Environmental Sciences (RIBES), Radboud University, Heyendaalseweg 135, 6525 AJ Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2365-9436
Ad M J RagasDepartment of Environmental Science, Radboud Institute for Biological and Environmental Sciences (RIBES), Radboud University, Heyendaalseweg 135, 6525 AJ Nijmegen, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pharmaceutical production substantially contributes to global greenhouse gas emissions. The application of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to evaluate these impacts is hindered by the limited Life Cycle Inventory (LCI) data. Existing LCI estimation methods often exclude key operations such as waste treatment and tablet formulation, relying on broad assumptions that lead to incomplete assessments. To address these gaps, this study developed a method to estimate industrial energy usage by upscaling laboratory-scale data. This method includes Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API) synthesis, tablet formulation, and auxiliary operations. Process Design Calculations (PDCs) derived in our method improve the energy estimation for unit operations. The application of this method to six pharmaceuticals resulted in total energy estimates exceeding those of the existing methods by over 102% for Lidocaine, Diclofenac, Paracetamol, and Ibuprofen. Higher estimated energy usage led to a 3% to 49% increase in carbon footprint, primarily because operations previously left out contributed over 17% to the total carbon footprint. The new method's energy-based carbon footprint seems to align better with industrial reference data than other methods. We conclude that our method improves the estimation of industrial energy usage for pharmaceutical production and reduces the risk of impact underestimation. It enables LCA practitioners to conduct more reliable assessments, supporting sustainability decisions.

Indexed as

active pharmaceutical ingredientscarbon footprintchemicalslife cycle inventoryprospective LCAsustainability

Identifiers

PMID41346401
PMCPMC12673579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.