ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone versus levodopa/benserazide plus pramipexole in Chinese patients with Parkinson's disease experiencing wearing off.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of direct switch from levodopa/benserazide (LB) to levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone (LCE) versus LB plus pramipexole (PPX) in Chinese patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) experiencing wearing off (WO). Methods: In this multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, observational study, 140 patients with PD experiencing WO who had been on stable LB treatment were enrolled and randomized 3:2 to receive LCE (84) or LB + PPX (56) treatment for 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in the daily "OFF" time from baseline. Change in the daily "ON" time was also assessed. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were recorded. Results: Seventy-nine patients in the LCE group and 49 patients in the PPX group completed the study. Both LCE and PPX shortened the patients' daily OFF time significantly after 8 weeks (-1.76 ± 1.70 h, Conclusion: LCE and LB + PPX were both effective, safe and tolerable in treating patients with PD who experienced WO.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.