Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41346377›Full record

ReviewInflammatory intestinal diseases

Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Where We Stand and What Is Next.

Dai Ishikawa, Xiaochen Zhang, Kei Nomura, Akihito Nagahara

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Inflammatory intestinal diseases. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dai IshikawaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Xiaochen ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Kei NomuraDepartment of Gastroenterology, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Akihito NagaharaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is an emerging therapeutic strategy for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Every step of the FMT process, from donor recruitment and patient selection to pretreatment protocols, administration techniques, and post-FMT interventions, can significantly influence treatment outcomes. These components are interrelated, and even subtle differences in methodology may affect the overall efficacy of FMT for IBD. This review aimed to outline the current clinical experience and findings regarding FMT for IBD during the application process. Summary: Donor screening has traditionally focused on safety. In recent years, although safety remains essential, increasing attention has been paid to the donor selection efficacy. Particularly, identifying patients who are most likely to benefit from FMT is crucial because timely and appropriate patient selection can prevent delays in effective treatment. Pretreatment strategies and FMT procedures remain hot topics of current research. Approaches, such as antibiotic pretreatment, may enhance microbial engraftment; however, the optimal antibiotic combination remains unclear. Bowel lavage is commonly used to reduce the microbial burden and facilitate donor microbiota colonization, whereas corticosteroid pretreatment has shown conflicting results. There are various routes of administration, and oral capsules are gaining popularity owing to their safety and patient acceptability. Stool preparation factors, including the use of single versus pooled donors, anaerobic processing, and storage form (fresh, frozen, or freeze-dried), can significantly influence microbial viability and clinical outcomes. Repeated FMTs tend to be more effective than single infusions; nonetheless, the optimal frequency remains unclear. Post-FMT interventions, such as dietary modifications and supplementation with prebiotics, such as pectin and alginic acid, are also promising strategies. Key Messages: Despite encouraging results, variations in treatment protocols, donor characteristics, and host factors continue to obscure the definitive predictors of FMT success. Further randomized controlled trials and mechanistic studies are required to standardize these procedures and optimize their long-term efficacy.

Indexed as

Administration techniquesApplication processFecal microbiota transplantationInflammatory bowel diseaseTreatment protocols

Identifiers

PMID41346377
PMCPMC12674670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.