ArticleFrontiers in aging2025
The association between anserine bursa pain and fall susceptibility: a prospective analysis of the osteoarthritis initiative.
Article in Frontiers in aging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Anserine bursa pain (ABP) is hypothesized to correlate with early-stage knee osteoarthritis (KOA). This research seeks to investigate the link between ABP and the incidence of falls in patients diagnosed with KOA or those at heightened risk of developing this condition. Method: The study utilized 2-year follow-up data derived from the Osteoarthritis Initiative cohort, a comprehensive multicenter observational investigation. Assessment of ABP was conducted through a tenderness/pain evaluation of the anserine bursa, while fall occurrences were self-reported by participants. Binary logistic regression was conducted, adjusting for confounding variables, and results were expressed as ORs along with their 95% CIs. Results: Data from 3,654 participants were analyzed, with 33.3% reporting ABP. Throughout the follow-up duration, 1,668 participants recorded instances of falls, 1,986 reported no falls, and 244 experienced recurrent falls annually. The primary outcome focused on incident falls, revealing a significant association between ABP and the odds of incident falls over the 2-year follow-up (odds ratio (OR) = 1.188, 95% Confidence interval (CI): 1.021-1.383, P = 0.026). When recurrent falls were included as an additional outcome, ABP was found to markedly predict the odds of these incidents over the 2-year follow-up (OR = 1.422, 95% CI: 1.065-1.898, P = 0.017). Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these findings among female participants and those without a prior history of falls. Conclusion: Within individuals diagnosed with KOA or those at substantial risk for KOA, a significant association exists between ABP and increased odds of falling over the 2-year follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.