ArticleGlobal cardiology science & practice2025
Recurrent, isolated left main coronary artery stenosis in a young female.
Article in Global cardiology science & practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A 21-year-old female with no prior cardiac history presented multiple times with chest pain and elevated cardiac biomarkers. Single-photon emission computed tomography revealed a reversible perfusion defect, and coronary angiography was attempted, but was aborted. After multiple similar presentations without angiography, the patient suffered ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Coronary angiography revealed 99% subtotal occlusion of the left main coronary artery and a reduced ejection fraction of 20% complicated by cardiac arrest and cardiogenic shock requiring mechanical circulatory support-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention and veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a bridge to recovery. An extensive workup did not reveal any secondary causes. Despite frequent follow-up and strict adherence to dual antiplatelet therapy, she developed recurrent angina and was found to have severe in-stent restenosis of the left main coronary artery, requiring two-vessel coronary artery bypass grafting. Despite normal blood counts prior to surgery, post-surgical labs revealed blast-phase acute myeloid leukemia, prompting the initiation of chemotherapy.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.