ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2025
Development and Bayesian Uncertainty Quantification of Coarse-Grained Models of Metals Based on Embedded Atom Method Potentials.
Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coarse-grained (CG) molecular dynamics (MD) simulations have emerged as a powerful and cost-effective approach for modeling materials by simplifying atomic structures into CG beads. However, accurately parametrizing interatomic potential models (force fields, FFs) that can reliably reproduce material properties and quantifying the uncertainties associated with both the model parameters and their predictions remains a major challenge. In this study, we developed coarse-grained embedded atom method (CG EAM) potentials to model interatomic interactions in face-centered cubic (FCC) metals, including palladium (Pd), gold (Au), silver (Ag), copper (Cu), and platinum (Pt). The CG EAM potentials combine the physical interpretability of a traditional EAM with the computational efficiency of coarse-graining. We first employed a Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) framework integrated with CG MD simulations to explore a 14-dimensional parameter space and identify CG EAM parameters that reproduce key physical, mechanical, and thermodynamic properties, such as cohesive energy, lattice constants, and elastic moduli. These parameters were subsequently refined using a Bayesian uncertainty quantification (BUQ) approach, which allowed the systematic assessment of uncertainties in both the FF parameters and the predicted properties. For all five metals, this framework yielded robust parameter ranges within which the predicted properties generally remained within their 95% confidence intervals. Overall, this integrated parameter optimization and BUQ approach provides an effective strategy for developing accurate and reliable interatomic potentials while offering a generalizable framework for designing both hard and soft materials with targeted properties.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.