ArticleJournal of occupational health2026
Comprehensive urinary metabolite profiles of workers exposed to aniline, 2,4-dimethylaniline, and 2-methylaniline.
Article in Journal of occupational health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesBiological exposure monitoring is particularly useful for understanding skin absorption of hazardous substances; however, existing measurement methods for aromatic amines show room for improvement, as they focus only on unchanged compounds. This study aimed to determine urinary concentrations of the unchanged compounds and metabolites of 3 aromatic amines (aniline, 2,4-dimethylaniline [m-xylidine], and 2-methylaniline [o-toluidine]) following enzymatic hydrolysis pretreatment, to calculate their proportions, and to assess markers for occupational biological exposure monitoring.
methodsUrine samples were collected at the end of work shifts on consecutive days from 11 workers at a plant handling aromatic amines. Samples were enzymatically hydrolyzed using glucuronidase and sulfatase. The urinary concentrations of 25 substances were determined using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.
resultsAfter exposure to the 3 aromatic amines, the major urinary excretion types were benzene ring-hydroxylated compounds, ring-hydroxylated and N-acetylated compounds, and side-chain methyl group oxides. The presence of unchanged and N-acetylated compounds was minor. Metabolism and urinary excretion were relatively different between the workers in our study and reported values from animal studies.
conclusionsExcluding metabolites with low specificity, the sum of unchanged compounds and primary metabolites in urine could be a useful marker for biological exposure monitoring. Regarding aniline exposure, the relevant markers are the sum of aniline, N-acetyl-4-hydroxyaniline, and 2-hydroxyaniline. For 2,4-dimethylaniline exposure, the markers are the sum of 2,4-dimethylaniline, N-acetyl-4-carboxy-2-methylaniline, and 6-hydroxy-2,4-dimethylaniline. For 2-methylaniline exposure, the markers are the sum of 2-methylaniline, N-acetyl-4-hydroxy-2-methylaniline, 4-hydroxy-2-methylaniline, and 6-hydroxy-2-methylaniline. Urine sampling is recommended at the end of work shifts on consecutive working days.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.