ArticleEuropean journal of neurology2025
Functional Neurological Disorder Following COVID-19: Results From a Large International Electronic Health Record Database.
Article in European journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Functional Neurological Disorder Following COVID-19: Results From a Large International Electronic Health Record Database.European journal of neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFollowing COVID-19, an increased risk of neurological and psychiatric sequelae has been reported. Viral illnesses commonly trigger functional neurological disorder (FND). However, mechanisms beyond immediate biological effects may contribute to FND after COVID-19. While FND cases have been observed after COVID-19, the overall risk and contributing factors remain unclear. In this retrospective cohort study, we compared the rates of FND post-COVID-19 to other respiratory tract infections (RTIs), assessed the influence of disease severity, and the characteristics of newly diagnosed patients.
methodsWe used TriNetX, a global electronic health record network. In total, 2,740,094 COVID-19 cases and 1846 post-COVID-19 FND cases were analysed. We compared FND incidence between 2 weeks and 6 months after COVID-19 to other RTIs and across cohorts of varying COVID-19 severity. Characteristics of individuals with new diagnoses of FND and migraine following COVID-19 were compared.
resultsThe incidence of FND was higher in COVID-19 patients with records of hospitalisation (OR 2.165; 95% CI 1.691-2.773) and emergency department visits (OR 1.412; 95% CI 1.069-1.864). Incidence was higher following COVID-19 compared to other RTIs, both in the first 2 years of the pandemic (0.033 vs. 0.021%, OR 1.555, 95% CI 1.271-1.902) and subsequently (0.038 vs. 0.027%, OR 1.394, 95% CI 1.173-1.657). Medical, neurological, and psychiatric comorbidities were more common in newly diagnosed post-COVID-19 FND compared to migraine.
conclusionsNew-onset FND appears more likely after COVID-19 than other RTIs. Both the severity of the triggering illness and pre-existing individual vulnerability may contribute to the development of FND.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.