ReviewThe Veterinary record2026
Scoping review to assess online guidance about poultry farm biosecurity for farmers in the UK.
Review in The Veterinary record, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Scoping review to assess online guidance about poultry farm biosecurity for farmers in the UK.The Veterinary record · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBiosecurity is the primary defence against diseases such as avian influenza (AI) for poultry farms. This research reviews online resources to assess the availability and topics shaping biosecurity advice for poultry farmers.
methodsA rapid scoping review examined biosecurity guidelines available to UK poultry farmers on 10 websites (www.gov.uk; www.gov.scot; www.gov.wales; www.bfrepa.co.uk; www.nfuonline.com; www.britishpoultry.org.uk; www.redtractor.org.uk; www.bvpa.co.uk; www.bva.co.uk; www.britisheggindustrycouncil.com). Webpages were analysed against key criteria, including topics and levels of detail.
resultsUltimately, 174 webpages were analysed. Government websites housed many pages relevant to poultry biosecurity, while assurer and trade union sites contained fewer. There was a broad consensus across websites on the topics covered, with hygiene and administrative guidance included on the largest number of webpages. Most webpages contained only limited or some relevant details, often repeating key messages rather than offering comprehensive implementation guidance. Pages with extensive detail were linked to regularly and appeared early in search results. LIMITATIONS: Northern Ireland's government website was not reviewed.
conclusionMany webpages advising on poultry farm biosecurity exist. They often highlighted the importance of hygiene measures and administrative actions. However, the lack of detailed implementation guidance may present challenges for farmers seeking to learn how to implement good biosecurity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.