ArticleThe Veterinary record2026
Preliminary investigation of equine veterinary hospital staff attitudes towards pain assessment in a single centre.
Article in The Veterinary record, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDespite the availability of several equine pain assessment tools, their use in equine veterinary practice appears limited compared to small animal practice. This study explores potential barriers to equine pain assessment, as reported by staff at a single UK equine teaching hospital.
methodsNine hospital staff members were interviewed using semi-structured interviews. Key themes were identified through reflexive thematic analysis.
resultsParticipants acknowledged the importance of pain assessment, yet highlighted limitations in current methods and their inconsistent use. Key challenges included limited observer confidence, subjective interpretations and discrepancies between staff and owner perceptions. Variability in horse temperament and pain presentation further complicated the assessment. Staff expressed a desire for improvements in pain assessment tools and clearer protocols. LIMITATIONS: The study was limited by its single-hospital design, short interview duration and small sample size.
conclusionThe study highlights the complexity of equine pain assessment in clinical practice, including tool limitations, knowledge gaps and contextual barriers. Despite valuing pain assessment, staff reported difficulties applying currently available methods. Findings suggest a need for improved tools, training and institutional support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.