ArticleDiagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey)2026
Potential radiation dose reduction in computed tomography with deep learning reconstruction: a retrospective monocentric study.
Article in Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate whether deep learning reconstruction (DLR) can reduce the radiation dose in routine clinical computed tomography (CT) scans compared with iterative reconstruction (IR) while maintaining or improving image quality. The study assesses DLR's consistency and effectiveness across four distinct CT protocols-chest, head, chest-abdomen-pelvis (CAP) oncology, and lower limb CT angiography (CTA)-representing a wide range of clinical applications.
methodsOur study is retrospective and monocentric. It involves a total population of 13,060 patients who underwent a CT scan using either a DLR algorithm (CT-DLR) or an IR algorithm (CT-IR) in one of four different CT acquisition protocols. Image quality was evaluated qualitatively and quantitatively by measuring standardized signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio values. Assessment was performed on a subsample of 200 patients (25 per protocol per group).
resultsThe overall reduction in radiation dose for the CT-DLR group compared with the CT-IR group was approximately 20%. By protocol, dose reductions were 22% for chest CT, 21% for CAP oncology, 20% for lower limb CTA, and 19% for head CT. The CT-DLR group exhibited superior subjective and objective image quality to the CT-IR group.
conclusionDLR algorithms allow for a significant reduction in radiation dose while achieving higher image quality compared with IR algorithms. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This large-scale study confirms that DLR can significantly reduce the radiation dose in routine CT imaging while maintaining or enhancing diagnostic image quality. Its consistent performance across multiple protocols supports broader clinical adoption. Notably, the greatest dose reductions were observed in high-use protocols such as chest and CAP CT, underscoring DLR's potential to improve both individual patient care and long-term population-level radiation safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.