Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41346003›Full record

ArticlePediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology2025

Investigating the health economic burden of atopic disease in children from the EAT-On Study.

Ru-Xin Foong, Joanna Craven, George Du Toit, Helen A Brough, Alexandra F Santos, Gideon Lack, Tracey H Sach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Investigating the health economic burden of atopic disease in children from the EAT-On Study.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ru-Xin FoongDepartment of Women and Children's Health (Pediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7974-0068
Joanna CravenDepartment of Women and Children's Health (Pediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
George Du ToitDepartment of Women and Children's Health (Pediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Helen A BroughDepartment of Women and Children's Health (Pediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Alexandra F SantosDepartment of Women and Children's Health (Pediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7805-1436
Gideon LackDepartment of Women and Children's Health (Pediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Tracey H SachSchool of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is growing interest in the health economic burden of childhood diseases. This study aimed to compare healthcare costs between atopic and non-atopic children in a general UK population.

methodsParticipants were recruited from the EAT-On study which followed children originally seen from 3 months old and then 7-12 years. A health economics questionnaire (HEQ) collected data from 2018 to 2022 on the utilization of UK healthcare services and were valued using published unit costs for UK£2021. Mean (standard deviation) resource use and cost were estimated for atopic and non-atopic children, in addition to mean difference (95% confidence interval) between atopic and non-atopic children. Two-part logistic regression analyses were performed to examine the likelihood of a child incurring healthcare costs including variables associated with the level of cost incurred.

results625 children completed the HEQ; 33% reported zero healthcare costs over a 12-month period and 34.4% (215/625) had at least 1 atopic disease. Children with any atopic disease had higher total costs compared to those without atopic disease (mean difference £77 (95% CI -16.9, 170.6) per participant); if extrapolated to population level, this equated to £104.7 million more per year. Children with atopy were more likely to utilize hospital-based services compared to children without atopy (mean difference £104.3 (95% CI 36.2, 172.5) per participant). Being younger in the 7-12 y age bracket or coming from a lower income household (<£60,000/year) was associated with higher total healthcare costs.

conclusionChildren with atopy incur greater total healthcare costs compared to children without atopy.

Indexed as

Cost of IllnessHealth Care CostsHypersensitivity, ImmediateChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Kingdomatopic diseasefood allergyhealthcare costshealth economicsNHS

Identifiers

PMID41346003
PMCPMC12678843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.