ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2025
Professional baseball players demonstrate superior dynamic visual acuity and differences in vestibulo-ocular reflex performance, compared to similarly aged healthy controls.
Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Oculometric Measurement of Concussion Magnitude in Professional Baseball Catchers.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Correlation between sports visual ability and catching performance in elite collegiate baseball infielders: a position-specific analysis.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBaseball-specific movement paradigms require heightened ocular performance driven by the vestibular system. Normative data of vestibulo-ocular measures for high-level athlete populations is limited in the current literature, particularly under game-like conditions. This comparative cross-sectional study explores the vestibulo-ocular performance of professional baseball players, relative to healthy controls.
methodsThe computerized dynamic visual acuity (cDVA) test compared visual acuity during active head impulses in both horizontal and vertical planes relative to a static visual acuity measure. The video head impulse test (vHIT) measured the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gain (i.e., ratio of eye velocity to head velocity) of passive horizontal head impulses under typical and high velocity conditions. An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) approach was then used to determine the differences between a group of professional baseball players and a similarly aged control group.
resultsThe baseball players had significantly better acuity for each condition: static (p value = 0.005), horizontal (p value < .001), and vertical (p value = 0.021) of the cDVA test relative to the healthy controls. Additionally, mean difference in VOR gain between the high velocity and typical velocity head rotations during vHIT testing was significantly greater in the baseball players relative to the healthy controls (p value = 0.036).
conclusionThrough years of sport-specific training, professional baseball players are hypothesized to develop improved dynamic visual acuity as characterized by excellent performance in the cDVA test and disconjugate VOR gains across high velocity vHIT and typical velocity vHIT potentially due to greater eye acceleration during the initial milliseconds of a head impulse.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.