ArticleBMC medical education2025
Knowledge, attitude, and practice of hand hygiene among clinical nurses in a tertiary hospital in China: a cross-sectional perspective.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEffective hand hygiene is a fundamental aspect of ensuring clinical nursing safety and quality. This study aims to investigate the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of hand hygiene among clinical nurses, thereby providing evidence-based recommendations for clinical nursing and hygiene management.
methodsThe study was carried out between September 2024 and January 2025, involving clinical nurses from our hospital. Data were collected using a validated and widely recognized KAP questionnaire. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: not applicable.
resultsA total of 364 clinical nurses participated in the study. The accuracy rate of hand hygiene knowledge was 75.82%. Factors significantly associated with nurses' hand hygiene knowledge included years of nursing experience, professional title, receipt of hand hygiene training within the past three months, and the total duration of hand hygiene training received over the past three months. Professional title, working department, and receipt of hand hygiene training within the past three months were significant predictors of nurses' attitudes toward hand hygiene. Working department, receipt of hand hygiene training within the past three months, and the total duration of hand hygiene training received over the past three months were significant factors influencing nurses' hand hygiene practices.
conclusionsClinical nurses demonstrated moderate levels of hand hygiene knowledge, with notable gaps in identifying specific indications for hand hygiene. These findings underscore the need for targeted training programs, sustained practice reinforcement, and supportive environmental interventions to enhance hand hygiene compliance and reduce the incidence of healthcare-associated infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.