ArticlePorcine health management2025
Varied residential options for gestating sows ensured welfare and productivity.
Article in Porcine health management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdult sows spend more than 50% of their time in units for gestating sows. Consequently, the functionality of these facilities is important for their well-being. This project aimed to depict the well-being of loose housed gestating sows in uninsulated buildings by documenting behaviours, aggressions, stereotypical behaviours and treatments/cullings of sows. Sows were fed individually with an animal-adapted transponder technology with four eating cubicles that allowed individual feeding adjustments. Between meals, the sows could choose from occupying themselves in a tent with deep litter straw or a barn with sawdust and chopped straw.
resultsSows weaned 13.0 ± 0.7 piglets per litter at a mean age of 31 days with a mean weight of 11.2 ± 0.9 kg. Everyday monitoring and handling of 150–160 gestating sows demanded 32 ± 12 minutes per day of the staff. Medical treatments (9%) and cullings (1%) of non-lactating sows were rare. During gestation, most of the sows preferred to stay in the tent where they mainly rested, but daytime there were always sows in the barn where they were more active. Air temperatures and humidity remained comfortable throughout the year but differed between seasons. During spring, summer and autumn, queuing in front of the eating cubicles were rare and few aggressions were recorded. The activity of the sows was lowest during summer when sows also rested individually. Sows were most active during winter when they rested and moved in groups. Consequently, queuing and interactions in front of the feeding cubicles increased. However, most of these interactions were directed to the side or rear of another sow, and not against the head. Sows ate hierarchically, old sows ate first during the day and gilts last. No stereotypic behaviour was recorded.
conclusionsProviding sows with varied residential options between meals and individually adjusted feeding during the gestating period ensured motion and well-being without reducing productivity and with low incidences of aggressions and medical treatments/cullings. The study also confirmed that gestating sows can be housed in uninsulated buildings during winter, if they are shielded from wind and can guard themselves from chill, e.g. by bivouacking themselves in deep litter straw.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.