ArticleHarm reduction journal2025
A qualitative study of health, social, and community professionals' practices to reduce alcohol-related risks among people living in social precarity in the Greater Paris region.
Article in Harm reduction journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Alcohol-related harms constitute a major global public health challenge. Despite similar consumption levels to their more affluent counterparts, alcohol-related morbidity and mortality is disproportionately higher in socioeconomically deprived populations. People living in social precarity face multiple barriers to accessing traditional treatment services, making alcohol harm reduction (AHR) practices particularly relevant for them. This qualitative study, conducted in the Greater Paris region, described and analyzed AHR practices adopted by health, social, and community professionals working in different types of care facilities with people living in social precarity who consume alcohol. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 31 professionals in 11 different facilities, including addiction care centers, harm reduction centers, and housing facilities. A thematic analysis of the data revealed three AHR practices: (i) authorizing the consumption of alcohol on the premises, (ii) managing users' level of alcohol consumption, and (iii) providing prevention interventions and information on alcohol consumption. Not all three practices were implemented by all 11 facilities. Specifically, the practices implemented depended on (i) whether alcohol cessation was the primary goal of the professional and the facility, and (b) the specific needs of the facility's users. All 11 facilities shared a common focus of building trust and adapting their practices to their user profile. In contrast, the level of patient engagement varied according to facility type from passive to active involvement. A consensual definition of the concept of AHR for people living in social precarity is essential to standardize related practices, with a view to objectively assessing their effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.