ArticleAmerican journal of botany2025
Pangenomes as a framework for adaptive radiation, speciation, and adaptation.
Article in American journal of botany, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative genomics reveals population structure and functional differentiation in Limosilactobacillus fermentum.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Pangenomes as a framework for adaptive radiation, speciation, and adaptation.American journal of botany · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding the genomic basis of diversification is a central goal in evolutionary biology. In recent years, the development and use of pangenomes, a genomic representation of multiple individuals within a lineage (a set of related populations, subspecies, ecotypes, or species), has enabled researchers to differentiate between DNA sequences shared by all individuals of a given lineage (core regions) from those present only in some individuals (accessory or variable regions). Differentiating between core and accessory regions has highlighted a key limitation of relying on a single reference genome: It captures the genetic code of only one individual and this biases genomic analyses and our understanding of diversification. Here, we propose that by identifying genes associated with both core and accessory regions, we can deepen our understanding of the processes underlying diversification. We suggest that analyzing pangenomes and accessory regions will provide deeper insights into diversification, hybridization, and the genetic basis of adaptation and speciation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.