SynthesisBMC cancer2025
Updated dose-response meta-analysis of sexual activity and prostate cancer risk.
Synthesis in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to update the evidence on how sexual activity factors, including frequency of intercourse, number of female sexual partners, age at first intercourse, and number of ejaculations and masturbations relate to prostate cancer.
methodsWe conducted a comprehensive search across PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus up to October 19, 2025. We also reviewed existing study references for additional relevant research. To assess study consistency, we used I
resultsFrom 5,311 identified studies, 29 (315,193 participants) met the inclusion criteria. Positive but non-significant associations were observed between prostate cancer and more frequent sexual intercourse (OR = 1.02; 95% CI: 0.88, 1.18), a higher number of female partners (OR = 1.01; 95% CI: 0.90, 1.12), and masturbation frequency (OR = 1.12; 95% CI: 0.82, 1.54). Older age at first intercourse showed a negative but non-significant association (OR = 0.99; 95% CI: 0.90, 1.08), whereas higher ejaculation frequency demonstrated a significant protective effect (OR = 0.83; 95% CI: 0.77, 0.90).
conclusionThese findings suggest that most sexual behaviors are not significantly associated with prostate cancer risk. However, higher ejaculation frequency appears to have a protective effect. The results highlight the multifactorial nature of prostate cancer and emphasize the need for further research to clarify the role of sexual activity in disease prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.