Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41345816›Full record

ArticlePsychophysiology2025

How the Dominant Reading Direction Changes Parafoveal Processing: A Combined EEG/Eye-Tracking Study.

Xin Huang, Hezul Tin-Yan Ng, Chien Ho Lin, Ming Yan, Olaf Dimigen, Werner Sommer, Urs Maurer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xin HuangSchool of Psychology, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5079-8100
Hezul Tin-Yan NgWofoo Joseph Lee Consulting and Counselling Psychology Research Centre, Lingnan University, Hong Kong, China.
Chien Ho LinDepartment of Psychology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Ming YanDepartment of Psychology, University of Macau, Macau, China.
Olaf DimigenExperimental Psychology, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2507-2823
Werner SommerDepartment of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5266-3445
Urs MaurerDepartment of Psychology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.

Funding

German Academic Exchange Service 57447990Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Research Grants Council G-CUHK409/18
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reading directions vary across writing systems. Through long-term experience, readers adjust their visual systems to the dominant reading direction in their writing systems. However, little is known about the neural correlates underlying these adjustments because different writing systems do not just differ in reading direction, but also in visual and linguistic properties. Here, we took advantage of the fact that Chinese is read to different degrees in left-to-right or top-to-bottom directions in different regions. We investigated visual word processing in participants from Taiwan (both top-to-bottom and left-to-right directions) and from mainland China (only left-to-right direction). We used combined EEG/eye-tracking with a saccade-contingent parafoveal preview manipulation to investigate how the dominant reading direction shapes neural visual processing while participants read 5-word lists. Fixation-related potentials (FRPs) showed a reduced late N1 effect (preview positivity), but this effect was modulated by prior experience with a specific reading direction. Results replicated previous findings that valid previews facilitate visual word processing, as indicated by reduced FRP activation. Critically, the results provide the first neuroelectric evidence that this facilitation effect depends on experience with a given reading direction. The findings provide insight into how cultural experience shapes the way people process visual information and demonstrate how a person's everyday visual experience can influence how the brain processes parafoveal information.

Indexed as

Evoked PotentialsPattern Recognition, VisualReadingAdultChinaElectroencephalographyEye-Tracking TechnologyFemaleFixation, OcularFovea CentralisHumansMaleTaiwanYoung AdultChinesecombined EEG/eye trackingFRPsvertical reading experiencevisual word recognition

Identifiers

PMID41345816
PMCPMC12678225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.