ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2025
Soil property controls on plasticiser, antioxidant and UV absorber additive degradation across a global soil gradient.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Additives in agricultural plastics can leach into the surrounding soil during use or improper disposal. Their subsequent degradation rates directly regulate whether they persist and accumulate to levels with ecotoxicological effects or are rendered benign. However, which soil properties primarily regulate the degradation of additives remains unclear (e.g. soil carbon, pH, available nutrients, microbial biomass and community structure). We assessed the degradation of the common plastic additives with different functionalities (DEHP (di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate; plasticiser), 2-hydroxy-4-n-octyloxybenzophenone (benzophenone-12; BP12; UV stabiliser) and AO168 (tris(2,4-di-tert-butylphenyl) phosphite; antioxidant)) in soils under controlled moisture and temperature conditions over 21 days across contrasting agricultural soils from six countries across a global transect (Australia, Brazil, Egypt, India, Vietnam and the UK). DEHP followed zero-order degradation kinetics, with negligible degradation in soils with low microbial biomass. BP12 degraded fastest via first-order degradation kinetics via ether cleavage and hydroxyl loss. The degradation of DEHP and BP12 was correlated with soil microbial biomass and nitrate concentration. BP12 degradation products detected included benzophenone and benzoic acid. DEHP is degraded via β-oxidation of alkyl groups to dibutyl phthalate and diethyl phthalate and through ester hydrolysis to phthalic acid. AO168 degraded via abiotic oxidation and phosphate ester hydrolysis to 2,4-di-tert-butyl-phenol, and degradation was not well correlated with any measured soil variable. Overall, these results show that the components of additive mixtures leached into soils will degrade at different rates due to varying mechanisms and controls exerted by the soil microbial biomass. Plastic additives have differing potentials to persist in agricultural soils globally, with some likely to accumulate to levels that may impact soil function and pose an ecotoxicological threat to soil biota.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.