Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41345717›Full record

ArticleCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2025

Tumor shrinkage patterns and optimal timing of response assessment during neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer: a study based on multiparametric MRI.

Jingbo Wang, Yacong Liu, Tianhui Liu, Yanbo Li, Xiaoxu Ma, Yishan Zhao, Hong Lu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Comparison of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jingbo Wang *Department of Breast Imaging, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.
Yacong Liu *Department of Radiology, Tianjin Central Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tianjin, China.
Tianhui LiuDepartment of Breast Imaging, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.
Yanbo LiDepartment of Breast Imaging, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.
Xiaoxu MaDepartment of Breast Imaging, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.
Yishan ZhaoDepartment of Breast Imaging, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.
Hong LuDepartment of Breast Imaging, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China. honglu@tmu.edu.cn.

Funding

The National Natural Science Foundation of China 82172025The Science & Technology Development Fund of Tianjin Education Commission for Higher Education 2024KJ189
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the laws of tumor shrinkage and to determine the optimal time window for predicting the treatment efficacy (defined as rapid tumor shrinkage) during neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) in breast cancer using multiparametric MRI (mp-MRI).

methodsThis retrospective study included 215 breast cancer patients (221 breasts) who underwent complete NST and received mp-MRI at baseline and after 2, 4, and 6 treatment cycles. Tumors were categorized into four shrinkage patterns using latent class trajectory modeling (LCTM) based on changes in maximum tumor diameter on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI). Clinical, pathological, and imaging features were analyzed to identify independent predictors of shrinkage rate using multivariate logistic regression. A predictive model was then constructed by combining the independent predictors. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted to evaluate the model’s performance, and DeLong’s test was used to compare the area under the curve (AUC) between different models to assess predictive efficacy.

resultsUsing LCTM, based on the change patterns of maximum lesion diameter on the first phase of DCE-MRI, all 221 breast cancer cases were classified into four distinct shrinkage types. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified HER2 positivity, baseline peritumoral edema, DWI isointense signal at NST cycles 2/4/6, a lower early enhancement rate at cycle 6, and imaging features assessed at the fourth cycle—including non-mass enhancement, concentric shrinkage, and higher ADC values—as independent predictors of rapid tumor shrinkage. A combined model incorporating clinicopathological features and MRI characteristics at NST cycle 4 achieved the highest predictive performance (AUC = 0.814), which was comparable to that of the model based on cycle 6 imaging features (AUC = 0.759, P = 0.243). To determine the best-performing model, predictive models combining clinicopathological and baseline features with NST cycle 4 or cycle 6 imaging features were constructed. The AUCs were 0.835 and 0.796, respectively, with no significant difference (P = 0.319).

conclusionDistinct laws of tumor shrinkage were revealed during NST; the fourth cycle was identified as the critical time window for accurate prediction of rapid shrinkage using multiparametric MRI.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMultiparametric Magnetic Resonance ImagingNeoadjuvant TherapyAdultAgedDynamic Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeTumor BurdenBreast cancerMultiparametric MRINeoadjuvant systemic therapyTumor shrinkage patterns

Identifiers

PMID41345717
PMCPMC12781436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.