Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41345705›Full record

ArticleTrials2025

The clinical and cost effectiveness of a conservative treatment pathway compared to appendicectomy in children with uncomplicated acute appendicitis: study protocol for a randomised controlled multi-centre open-label parallel-group non-inferiority trial (CONTRACT 2 trial) in the United Kingdom (UK).

Natalia Vadimovna Permyakova, Isabel C Reading, Young Bridget, Simon Eaton, Maria Chorozoglou, Frances C Sherratt, Harriet Corbett, Darran Ball, Andrew Cook, Jessica Kelly and 2 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Natalia Vadimovna PermyakovaSouthampton Clinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK. n.v.permyakova@soton.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3549-3215
Isabel C ReadingPrimary Care and Population Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Young BridgetDepartment of Public Health, Policy and Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Simon EatonUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
Maria ChorozoglouSouthampton Health Technology Assessment Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Frances C SherrattDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Harriet CorbettDepartment of Surgery, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Darran BallSouthampton Clinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Andrew CookSouthampton Clinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Jessica KellySouthampton Clinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Elizabeth DixonSouthampton Clinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Nigel J HallUniversity Surgery Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

Funding

Health Technology Assessment Programme NIHR131346
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrently, the most frequently used treatment for acute appendicitis in children in the United Kingdom (UK) is an appendicectomy. However, there is increasing scientific and patient interest and research into non-operative treatment of appendicitis. Despite a number of non-randomised studies in children and randomised studies in adults, comparative outcomes of non-operative treatment and appendicectomy in comparable groups of children remain unknown. Following the successful completion of a feasibility study, we now aim to perform a UK-based multi-centre open-label randomised controlled trial (RCT) to investigate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of non-operative treatment pathway of acute uncomplicated appendicitis in children compared with appendicectomy.

methodsNon-inferiority RCT with internal pilot, health economic evaluation and qualitative communication sub-study. The study is conducted in England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales at both specialist children's hospitals and district general hospitals. Children (aged 4-15 years inclusive) diagnosed with acute uncomplicated appendicitis that would normally be treated with an appendicectomy are eligible for the RCT. Exclusion criteria include clinical/radiological suspicion of perforated appendicitis, appendix mass or previous non-operative treatment of appendicitis. Sample size is 376 participants, recruited by surgeons and supported by research staff and randomised with a 1:1 allocation ratio to either non-operative treatment pathway (intervention) or appendicectomy (control). Participants in the intervention arm are treated with antibiotics, analgesia and regular clinical assessment to ensure clinical improvement. Participants in the control arm receive appendicectomy. Randomisation is minimised by age, sex, duration of symptoms and centre. The primary end-point is a composite outcome of treatment success at 1 year following randomisation. Secondary outcomes include: duration of hospital stay, measures of recovery from acute appendicitis, complications, need for further treatment, persistent symptoms, health care resource use, quality of life and costs. Adverse events, serious adverse events and suspected unexpected serious adverse events are collected directly on the database and by paper form up to 12-month visit. Primary outcome will be analysed on a non-inferiority basis using a 20% non-inferiority margin to test the hypothesis that non-operative treatment pathway is non-inferior to appendicectomy. Children and families who are approached for the RCT will be invited to participate in the embedded qualitative sub-study. This will include recording of recruitment consultations, which will inform future interventions to optimise recruitment. We have involved children, young people and parents in study design and delivery. DISCUSSION: This RCT will allow determination of the comparative clinical and cost-effectiveness of non-operative treatment pathway compared to appendicectomy for children with uncomplicated acute appendicitis in the UK. TRIAL STATUS: First planned enrolment-December 2022, first actual recruit-March 2022, current status of trial-open to recruitment.

trial registrationISRCTN16720026 . Registered on July 28, 2021.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAppendectomyAppendicitisConservative TreatmentAcute DiseaseAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolCost-Benefit AnalysisCost-Effectiveness AnalysisEquivalence Trials as TopicFemaleHospital CostsHumansLength of StayMaleAnti-Bacterial AgentsAbdominal painAppendicectomyAppendicitisEconomic evaluationEvidence-based medicineNon-inferiorityNon-operative treatmentPaediatric surgeryQualitative researchRandomised controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID41345705
PMCPMC12781549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.