Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41345675›Full record

ArticleActa veterinaria Scandinavica2025

Microbiological control project of minced meat of wild boar (Sus scrofa L.) in approved establishments in Sweden.

Arja Helena Kautto, Åsa Rosengren, Catarina Flink, Cathrine Domeij

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta veterinaria Scandinavica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Arja Helena KauttoDepartment of Animal Biosciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Ulls Väg 26, Uppsala, Sweden. arja.helena.kautto@slu.se.
Åsa RosengrenDivision for Advice and Regulation, Unit for Food Hygiene, Swedish Food Agency, Dag Hammarskjöldsvägen 56 A, 75126, Uppsala, Sweden.
Catarina FlinkDivision for Advice and Regulation, Unit for Food Hygiene, Swedish Food Agency, Dag Hammarskjöldsvägen 56 A, 75126, Uppsala, Sweden.
Cathrine DomeijControl Support Unit, Department of Food Control, Swedish Food Agency, Dag Hammarskjöldsvägen 56 A, 75126, Uppsala, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aims of this study were to enhance knowledge of microbiological status of minced meat of Swedish wild boar and to evaluate its compliance with the Commission Regulation (EC) No 2073/2005 on microbiological criteria for foodstuffs. The sampling was performed by the official control staff at Swedish Food Agency during 2024. While wild boar has the capacity to harbor a diverse range of zoonotic agents there is a lack of microbiological data on the products derived from wild boar carcasses. More information concerning the microbiological status of minced meat of wild boar is needed. These results could contribute to the development of risk-based management strategies and the verification of control measures through the safe game meat chain. One sample from each of selected 33 approved establishments producing minced meat of wild boar was sent to a commercial laboratory accredited for the analyses. Process hygiene criteria Aerobic Colony Count (ACC) and Escherichia coli were analysed as well as food safety criteria Salmonella spp. and results were assessed according to the microbiological criteria for minced meat. Results show no presence of Salmonella spp. in any of the samples. The 165 units, clustered in 33 plants, had a median for ACC 5.6 log

Indexed as

Food MicrobiologyMeatSus scrofaAnimalsEscherichia coliFood SafetySalmonellaSwedenSwineAerobic colony countEscherichia coliGame handlingMicrobiological criteriaRisk managementSalmonella spp.

Identifiers

PMID41345675
PMCPMC12679738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.