Trial reportCritical care (London, England)2025
Influence of different airway devices on intra-arrest ventilation during bag-valve-device ventilation - a prospective randomized controlled cadaver study.
Trial report in Critical care (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06306898 (Intra-Arrest-Ventilation - a Prospective Randomized Trial in Human Cadavers), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Intra-Arrest-Ventilation - a Prospective Randomized Trial in Human Cadavers
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of laryngeal tube evo with tracheal intubation during intra-arrest-ventilation using biphasic positive pressure ventilation - a prospective randomized controlled body donor study.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Trial
- Comparison of bag-valve-device ventilation and volume-controlled ventilation with laryngeal tube evo in intra-arrest ventilation-a prospective randomized study in human body donors.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2026Article
- Using design thinking to identify training needs in CPR education: a qualitative study with nursing students and professionals.BMC nursing · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOut-of-hospital cardiac arrest remains a major challenge due to its high incidence and low survival rates. In recent decades, research has focused on the performance of chest compressions and improvements in early defibrillation, while the optimal ventilation strategy remains unclear. Despite the lack of monitoring systems, manual bag-valve-device ventilation is still common. Given the potential impact of both the applied volumes and the ventilation pressures on hemodynamics and resuscitation efforts, the present study investigated the effects of various airway devices on the target parameters of ventilation therapy during manual intra-arrest ventilation.
methodsThiel-embalmed human cadavers were included in a standardized resuscitation scenario. Ventilation was performed in a randomized order using various airway devices (tracheal tube (ET), supraglottic airway devices (SGA): laryngeal mask airway, laryngeal tube, i-gel
resultsEleven cadavers were included (mean age at the time of death: 84 ± 3.7 years, male = 7 [63.6%]). During ventilation with ET, the following mean values were measured: ΔVt, 142.2 ± 125.5 ml; Vt
conclusionThe ∆Vt was lower in the ET group than the SGA group, whereas there was no evidence for differences in ∆Vt among the devices in the SGA group.
trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT06306898, Registration date: 5 March 2024.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.