Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41345663›Full record

ArticleBioData mining2025

Radio Frequency Tagging-enabled patient monitoring: integrating mobility tracking with early warning systems for enhanced safety.

Ahed Abugabah, Prashant Kumar Shukla, Piyush Kumar Shukla, Abhishek Dwivedi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioData mining, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ahed AbugabahCollege of Technological Innovation, Zayed University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Prashant Kumar ShuklaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering & Deputy Dean Research (ASET), Amity School of Engineering and Technology (ASET), Amity University, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 410206, India.
Piyush Kumar ShuklaDepartment of Computer Science & Engineering, University Institute of Technology, Rajiv Gandhi Proudyogiki Vishwavidyalaya (State Technological University of Madhya Pradesh), Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Abhishek DwivediDepartment of Data Science and Engineering, School of Computer Science & Engineering, Manipal University Jaipur, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India. abhishek.dwivedi@jaipur.manipal.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ensuring patient safety in healthcare environments requires continuous monitoring systems capable of identifying early warning signs of clinical risk. Traditional surveillance methods often fail to capture meaningful patterns in patient movement, limiting their ability to prevent incidents such as falls, prolonged immobility, or unnoticed health deterioration. Radio Frequency Tagging technology has been increasingly adopted for real-time patient tracking; however, existing systems are generally limited to location detection and lack predictive insights into patient behaviour. To overcome these limitations, this study presents a Radio Frequency Tagging-based patient monitoring framework that integrates mobility tracking with an early warning mechanism to enable proactive health-care interventions. The proposed system uses a spatio-temporal probabilistic network to learn typical movement patterns from historical tagging data and applies a dynamic similarity analysis to detect deviations in real time. Anomaly scores generated from these comparisons are combined with clinical indicators to produce automated alerts for healthcare providers, supporting timely and informed responses. The framework is evaluated on a hybrid dataset comprising simulated tagging traces and publicly available physiological and activity data, including measurements of heart rate, respiration, and physical movement. The Dynamic Time Warping-based anomaly detection system achieved consistently high performance across all patient categories, with accuracy ranging from 87.5% to 91.0%, sensitivity between 88.4% and 96.2%, and F1-scores up to 93.5%, demonstrating its strong capability to effectively distinguish between normal and abnormal movement patterns across diverse clinical conditions. By combining location-based surveillance with predictive modelling and clinical scoring, the framework offers a context-aware and reliable tool for continuous patient monitoring, thereby enhancing safety and supporting data-driven clinical decision-making.

Identifiers

PMID41345663
PMCPMC12781683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.