ReviewPhilosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM2025
Understanding and addressing intimate partner violence: a comprehensive review.
Review in Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing coercive control in intimate partner relationships: psychometric validation and clinical thresholds of a French version of the Coercive Control Screening Scale (CCSS-F).European journal of psychotraumatology · 2026Article
- Prevalence of intimate partner violence (IPV) among women with mental illness in the tertiary hospital setting.BMC psychiatry · 2026Article
- Spatial variation and factors associated with women's injury due to intimate partner violence in Madagascar: Evidence from the 2021 demographic and health survey.Women's health (London, England)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) remains a pervasive and distressing societal issue with far-reaching physical, emotional, and psychological consequences. This paper delves into the complex dynamics of IPV, aiming to enhance the comprehension of its root causes, contributing factors, and various manifestations. By synthesizing multidisciplinary research, it highlights the role of societal norms, cultural influences, and individual psychological traits in perpetuating such violence. Moreover, the paper elucidates the impact of IPV on survivors, children, families, and communities, emphasizing the urgent need for comprehensive intervention strategies. Drawing upon psychological, sociological, and criminological perspectives, the outlines existing theoretical frameworks that seek to explain the underlying mechanisms of IPV. It explores the cyclical nature of violence, power and control dynamics, as well as the intersectionality of factors such as gender, socioeconomic status, and race. By examining the various forms of IPV, including physical, emotional, sexual, and financial abuse, the paper underscores the importance of recognizing the subtler, non-physical forms of violence. In addressing IPV, evaluate the effectiveness of prevention and intervention programs across different contexts. It emphasizes the significance of early education, awareness campaigns, and policy initiatives in reshaping societal attitudes and dismantling cycles of violence. Additionally, the paper examines support systems for survivors, from crisis intervention and shelters to counseling and legal assistance, while considering the unique needs of marginalized and vulnerable populations.Ultimately, this paper underscores the urgent necessity for a holistic and collaborative approach to eradicating IPV. By understanding its intricate underpinnings and consequences, society can work collectively to challenge ingrained norms, promote healthy relationships, and provide survivors with the resources they need to rebuild their lives. Through a comprehensive exploration of IPV, this paper contributes to the ongoing discourse surrounding this critical issue and advocates for a future free from the shackles of intimate partner violence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.