Observational studyBMC surgery2025
Comparison of clinical efficacy of Ganz approach and K-L approach in treatment of Pipkin type IV femoral head fracture.
Observational study in BMC surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare the efficacy of Ganz approach and Kocher-Langenbeck (K-L) approach in Pipkin type IV femoral head fracture (FHF) with internal fixation.
methodsThe medical records of patients with Pipkin type IV FHF were assessed in the observational study. The patients were divided into Ganz approach group and K-L approach group. The surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, quality of acetabular fracture reduction, Thompson-Epstein clinical and radiological score, fracture healing time, Harris hip score, and complications were recorded.
resultsFifteen patients were followed for 12–23 months (mean 16.8 months). The Ganz approach group showed significantly better Thompson-Epstein clinical and radiological scores (7 excellent, 1 good) than the K-L group (2 excellent, 5 good) (P < 0.05). According to Matta radiographic criteria, anatomical reduction was achieved in 6 cases (with 2 satisfactory) in the Ganz group compared to 5 cases (with 2 satisfactory) in the K-L group, demonstrating a non-significant trend toward superiority for the Ganz approach (P > 0.05).
conclusionCompared with the traditional K-L approach, the Ganz approach offers better visual field exposure, better reduction quality of FH, and better postoperative functional recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.