Trial reportBMC pediatrics2025
Diode laser versus scalpel in the surgical treatment of infant ankyloglossia: a randomized, parallel, double-blind, controlled clinical trial.
Trial report in BMC pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnkyloglossia can impair vital functions such as breastfeeding, swallowing, and maxillomandibular development, making effective treatment essential. This study aimed to compare the clinical effectiveness of diode laser (DL) and scalpel (SC) frenotomy in infants with severe ankyloglossia.
methodsThis randomized, parallel, double-blind clinical trial evaluated the efficacy of diode laser surgery compared to conventional scalpel frenotomy in infants aged 0-6 months, all diagnosed with severe ankyloglossia (BTAT score 0-3) (n = 40/group). Patients were assessed at D0 (pre-, trans-, and/or 30 min postoperative), D7, and D14 using specific instruments according to each outcome: tongue repositioning and frenulum release (BTAT and Tongue Test), wound healing (Landry index), perioperative pain (CRIES scale), and breastfeeding performance (body mass variation, LATCH, and IBFAT scales).
resultsBoth the diode laser (DL) and scalpel (SC) groups showed significant functional improvements and weight gain over time (p < 0.001), with no significant intergroup differences in most outcomes (p > 0.05). However, on D7, the SC group demonstrated superior breastfeeding performance (LATCH: p = 0.003; IBFAT: p = 0.024). Both groups exhibited reduced pain and progressive healing (p < 0.001). In the diode laser group, a negative correlation was found between total energy applied and healing quality at D14 (r = - 0.355; p = 0.027).
conclusionsFindings suggest both techniques are clinically effective, but laser parameters may influence healing. Further studies are warranted to optimize laser protocols in pediatric ankyloglossia surgery.
trial registrationRBR466cykz November 13th, 2024.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.