Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41345603›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Depression and anxiety symptoms in male and female farmers: association with farm characteristics and mental health protection strategies in the FarmCoSwiss cohort.

P Ammann, A Jeong, G Lovison, J Doetzer, S Fuhrimann, M Imboden, K Ingold, M S Winkler, N Probst-Hensch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

P AmmannSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Switzerland. priska.ammann@swisstph.ch.
A JeongSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Switzerland.
G LovisonSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Switzerland.
J DoetzerSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Switzerland.
S FuhrimannSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Switzerland.
M ImbodenSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Switzerland.
K IngoldDepartment of Environmental Social Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Überlandstrasse 133, Eawag, Dübendorf, 8600, Switzerland.
M S WinklerSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Switzerland.
N Probst-HenschSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmpirical research on farmers’ mental health in Switzerland is limited. This study uses cross-sectional data from the first follow-up of the FarmCoSwiss cohort to descriptively compare depression and anxiety symptom prevalence between Swiss farmers and the Swiss general population. Furthermore, the association of these mental health outcomes with farm-related characteristics and individual-based mental health protection strategies was explored.

methodsOf 878 adult baseline participants, 600 (68%, thereof 67% men) completed the follow-up survey between March and June 2024. Depression and anxiety symptoms were assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) scales, respectively. Sum scores (0–27 and 0–21) were categorized as no/minimal, mild, moderate, or (moderately) severe symptoms for descriptive analyses. Key explanatory variables included five binary farm-related characteristics (farming system: non-organic or organic; production system: animal husbandry/mixed or no animal husbandry; farm size: ≤50 or > 50 hectares; label production: yes or no; management position: yes or no), and a binary indicator of the use of one or more individual-based mental health protection strategies (any or none). Depression and anxiety prevalences were descriptively compared to 2022 data from the Swiss Health Survey. Sex-stratified negative binomial regressions assessed associations between PHQ-9 and GAD-7 continuous sum scores and explanatory variables, adjusted for age, education, marital status, and season of participation.

resultsOver half of the participants (52.3%) reported no depression and anxiety symptoms. Moderate or severe symptoms were observed in 10.7% (depression) and 9.5% (anxiety). Descriptive comparisons to the Swiss general population suggest that depression and anxiety symptoms are slightly more common among FarmCoSwiss participants. Women generally reported higher symptom prevalence. In men only, the use of any mental health protection strategy was associated with lower PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores.

conclusionsWhile comparisons between two distinct study populations should be interpreted with caution, our findings suggest that depression and anxiety symptoms may be more prevalent among the Swiss farming population, particularly among women, than in the general population. Individual-based mental health protection strategies show promise for improving farmers’ mental health, but our results indicate a need for sex-specific strategies. Further longitudinal research on additional farm- and sex-specific factors affecting mental health in Swiss agriculture may be of interest.

Indexed as

AnxietyDepressionFarmersAdultCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceSurveys and QuestionnairesSwitzerlandAgricultureCohortFarmersMental healthOccupational health

Identifiers

PMID41345603
PMCPMC12781764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.