SynthesisThe journal of headache and pain2025
Cluster headache suicidality: a systematic review with a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in The journal of headache and pain, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSuicide is considered as common in patients with cluster headache (CH) and is defined as 'suicidal headache'. However, the exact level of suicidality is not known and is intuitively assumed to be correlated with the CH severity.
methodsThis work is a systematic review of data accessible through PubMed and published up to July 25, focusing on the suicidality of CH according to the rates of suicidal ideation and suicide attempts. This meta-analysis was carried out with all selected studies then by considering studies with specialized recruitment and studies with non-specialized recruitment. A qualitative analysis was performed to identify determinants of CH suicidality.
resultsAmong the 53 publications identified, 12 were selected corresponding to 10 studies. These selected studies included a total of 34180 subjects (range 75-24131). Eight were performed in a specialized field (headache tertiary center, neurology clinic or via CH patients' association) and 2 in a non-specialized field (via heath registry). The overall rate of suicidal ideation in CH was estimated at 8.0% (95%CI [7.7; 8.3] and overall rate of suicide attempts in CH was estimated at 1.2% (95%CI [1.1; 1.3]). In a non-specialized field, these rates were estimated at 5.2% (95%CI [4.9; 5.4]) and 1.1% (95%CI [1.0; 1.2]) respectively. In specialized field, these rates were estimated at 44.6% (95%CI [42.7; 46.6]) and 5.1% (95%CI [3.9; 6.7]) respectively. The qualitative analysis showed that few determinants have been considered but it appears that the risk is greater during CH attacks, and it involves psychological determinants such as demoralization.
conclusionThe overall suicidal risk in CH does not appear to be higher than that of the general population, but there is a suicidal risk increase among CH patients followed up in specialized field. This higher risk is indeed probably related to the severity of CH in terms of pain, but it is also probably related to other factors such as impulsive aggressiveness during CH attacks and psychological factors such as demoralization. REGISTRATION: The systematic review protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) on 07/22/2025 (number: CRD420251110095).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.