ArticleBMC anesthesiology2025
Ultrasound-guided gastrocnemius plane block: anatomical validation and clinical feasibility assessment.
Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveAs a feasibility study, this study primarily aimed to assess the feasibility of conducting a future randomized controlled trial (RCT) on gastrocnemius plane block (GPB), including evaluation of the clinical application and safety profile of the technique.
methodsThe study comprised two phases: (1) anatomical validation with methylene blue staining in 8 supra-knee amputated limbs, followed by (2) clinical feasibility study in 20 patients undergoing foot surgery. This anatomical study was to assess the degree and length of staining in sciatic nerve branches. The clinical study evaluated the onset and duration of sensory block, motor function of the tibial and common peroneal nerves, the anatomical relationship between the popliteal artery and tibial nerve, and postoperative sensory and motor abnormalities.
resultsThe cadaveric study exhibited full or strong staining of the medial and lateral sural cutaneous nerves, common peroneal nerve and tibial nerve with methylene blue across all 8 specimens. The clinical study exhibited that the median onset time of sensory blockade for the tibial nerve, common peroneal nerve, superficial and deep peroneal nerves at Level 1 were all ≤ 20 min, and for Level 0 sensory blockade, the median onset time were all ≤ 40 min. Seventeen patients experienced full onset of sensory block in all branches of the sciatic nerve within one hour, whereas three patients experienced hypoalgesia within one hour and achieved full onset within 70 min. In all patients, both the tibial nerve and the common peroneal nerve exhibited motor block at 4 h postblock. At 32 h, all patients had no motor block in toe movements. Among the patients, the tibial nerve was located in the 9-12 o'clock arc (anterior-medial to the PA) in 10 patients (50%), at 9 o'clock (medial to the PA) in 5 patients (25%), at 12 o'clock (anterior to the PA) in 3 patients (15%), at the 6-9 o'clock arc (posterior-medial to the PA) in 1 patient (5%), and at 6 o'clock (posterior to the PA) in 1 patient (5%). One month after surgery, telephone follow-up revealed no sensory abnormalities or motor dysfunction in any patient.
conclusionUltrasound-guided gastrocnemius plane block has the potential to offer a new postoperative analgesic option for foot and ankle surgeries in clinical settings. The findings from this feasibility study provide critical information for the design of subsequent definitive trials. Future large-scale randomized controlled trials (RCTs) can be conducted to confirm the efficacy of the GPB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.