ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2026
Molecular classification-driven stage migration and prognostic risk stratification in endometrial cancers: FIGO 2023 vs FIGO 2009.
Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exploring the molecular classification-based personalized treatment decision-making in FIGO stage I-III endometrial carcinoma after surgery: a population-based real-world study.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The FIGO 2023 staging system of endometrial cancers (ECs) encourages integration of molecular classification with traditional histopathologic parameters for better prognostication and improved treatment decisions; however, limited availability of molecular profiling hinders its universal adoption. We aimed to assess the impact of adding molecular classification on stage migration, risk-group stratification (ESGO/ESTRO/ESP), and adjuvant treatment protocols using FIGO 2023 vs FIGO 2009 staging. A total of 234 ECs were staged using FIGO 2023 and 2009 staging by either histomorphology alone ("Molecular classification unknown group"; n = 130/234), or by complete morpho-molecular categorization ("Molecular classification known group"; n = 104/203, using Sanger sequencing for POLE mutation, with immunohistochemistry for p53 and Mismatch-repair proteins). Significant stage shifts were noted with FIGO 2023, impacting chiefly low stage (stage I and II) ECs, with stage upshifts predominating over downshifts. Without molecular categorization, tumor stage upshifted in 12.3% and downshifted in 1.5% cases. Complimenting morphology with molecular categorization increased the proportion of stage shifts by 9.3%, with 21.2% upshifts and 1.9% downshifts. Both morphology (aggressive histology, substantial LVSI, tumor location) and molecular profile (p53abn/POLE mutation) contributed to stage shifts. Molecular classification changed prognostic risk-groups in 12.5 (13/104) vs 2.3% (3/130) patients without molecular profiling, potentially impacting adjuvant treatment protocols. Majority of patients with altered risk stratification could potentially benefit from a more aggressive treatment approach, while few patients could benefit from potential treatment de-escalation. Our results indicate that integrated morpho-molecular FIGO 2023 staging significantly impacts both stage and risk group stratification, and will benefit EC patients, particularly in high-grade early stage ECs, with potential treatment implications. Further comprehensive studies are needed to fully establish the implications of molecular classification in the FIGO 2023 staging system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41345523What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.