ArticleScientific reports2025
Evaluation of deep learning MRI reconstruction for dental implant crowns in a phantom study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep learning (DL) reconstruction is increasingly applied in clinical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to improve image quality and reduce scan time, but its impact on dental metal artifacts remains unclear. This pilot phantom study evaluated DL reconstruction compared with conventional reconstruction for various implant crowns. Acrylic phantoms containing titanium implants with four crown types-zirconia, PMMA, gold, and Ni-Cr metal-were scanned on a 3.0-T MRI system. Axial T1- and T2-weighted sequences were acquired using identical imaging parameters. Image quality (noise and signal-to-noise ratio [SNR]) and metal artifacts (visual scores and artifact ratio) were evaluated in the slice showing the largest crown area. DL reconstruction consistently reduced noise and improved SNR across all crown types and sequences. Metal artifact severity followed the material-dependent order: zirconia < PMMA < gold < Ni-Cr metal, in both sequences. Visual assessment showed no difference in artifact severity between DL and conventional images. DL reduced artifacts only in zirconia crowns on T2-weighted sequence (10.38% vs. 9.31%). These findings indicate that although DL reconstruction enhances overall image quality, its effectiveness in reducing dental metal artifacts remains limited. As this is a pilot study using phantoms, further in vivo validation is necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.