ArticleScientific reports2025
An explainable machine learning-based approach to predicting treatment response for neurofeedback in ADHD.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transdiagnostic EEG Signatures in ASD and ADHD: A Comparative Review of Computational Biomarkers and Neuromodulatory Interventions.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- A Random Forest-Based Risk Prediction Model for Non-Response to Methylphenidate in Children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common neurodevelopmental disorder with serious long-term effects if untreated, emphasizing the need for early treatment given its neurobiological heterogeneity. This study introduces a novel explainable machine learning framework to predict neurofeedback treatment response for personalized ADHD intervention, offering transparent and clinically actionable insights. Seventy-eight features, including demographic, behavioral, and personality questionnaire data from 72 ADHD patients (aged 6-68) from the two-decades brainclinics (TDBRAIN) database, were used. First, a preliminary statistical analysis selected 20 features, comprising NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI) questions, behavioral, and demographic data (age, education, sleep) for further analysis. Then, four feature reduction methods, mutual information, ReliefF, minimal-redundancy-maximal-relevance, and sequential forward selection (SFS), were utilized to select the best features. Five classifiers, random forest (RF), support vector machine, logistic regression, artificial neural network, and adaptive boosting, were used to predict neurofeedback treatment response in individuals with ADHD. Subsequently, shapley additive explanations (SHAP) values via TreeExplainer were crucial for interpretability, providing global feature importance and local explanations on model predictions. The results revealed that a hierarchical feature selection approach involved initial statistical filtering, followed by the SFS method, significantly improved the RF model's discrimination to 88.3 ± 6.8% accuracy with just seven optimal features, including NEO-FFI questions and education. Notably, five of the seven SFS features were among SHAP's top 10 most significant, demonstrating the internal consistency of the model and highlighting the features most critical to the model's prediction. Therefore, this transparent machine learning approach achieves competitively higher prediction performance than previous studies and supports personalized, trustworthy ADHD medical decisions, moving beyond black-box prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.