ArticleNPJ digital medicine2025
Deriving novel atrial fibrillation phenotypes using a tree-based artificial intelligence-enhanced electrocardiography approach.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The metabolic-inflammatory axis in chronic heart failure: integrating the NLR and TyG index for recent-onset atrial fibrillation prediction via machine learning and mediation analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Unsupervised Phenotyping of Atrial Fibrillation Using Variational Autoencoders in a Critical Care Cohort: The ATLAS-AF Study.Clinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is classically categorised by arrhythmia duration, but these subtypes have limitations in capturing mechanistic and prognostic diversity. A variational autoencoder, trained on >1.1M ECGs, extracted representative features, filtered for an AF cohort of 20,291 unique patients. These features were input into an unsupervised tree-based clustering method to map AF heterogeneity as a tree structure and identify phenogroups. Five phenogroups stratified by future disease risk were identified: (1) higher-risk AF; (2) highest-risk AF with heart failure (HF); (3) average paroxysmal AF; (4) lower-risk paroxysmal AF; and (5) higher-risk paroxysmal AF. The tree trajectory positioned individuals based on shared traits, emphasising explainability. Paroxysmal phenogroups 4 and 5 differed in risk and ventricular structure, with phenogroup 5 exhibiting more adverse features. Mixed AF phenogroup 2 reflected advanced AF with greater HF burden and mortality risk. This AI-ECG framework augments AF subtypes with a risk-based dimension, supporting personalised care.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.