ArticleScientific reports2025
Hemodynamic response to stent-induced aneurysm deformation in patient-specific internal carotid artery cases: A computational study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Digital Twins as the Implementation Layer of Precision Medicine in Pediatric Neurosurgery.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study presents a patient-specific computational analysis of hemodynamic alterations induced by stent-assisted deformation in five cerebral aneurysm models. Using high-fidelity geometrical reconstructions and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations, the effects of parent vessel deformation on Wall Shear Stress (WSS), Oscillatory Shear Index (OSI), and blood flow velocity were systematically evaluated across distinct aneurysm geometries. The results demonstrate that each model exhibited a unique hemodynamic response to deformation. Model A showed an increase in WSS and OSI, indicating enhanced flow instability; Model B remained largely insensitive, displaying negligible hemodynamic variation; Model C experienced reductions in OSI and velocity, suggesting a stabilized intra-aneurysmal environment; Model D revealed a gradual decrease and redistribution of axial velocity, reflecting attenuation of inflow momentum; and Model E exhibited a pronounced redirection of the inflow jet and asymmetric velocity field, accompanied by a moderate decline in flow magnitude. Overall, these findings emphasize the critical role of aneurysm morphology and vessel curvature in modulating post-treatment hemodynamics and reinforce the need for patient-specific computational modeling to guide stent design and placement for improved clinical outcomes in cerebral aneurysm management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.