ArticleScientific reports2025
Software effort estimation based on inception network optimized by enhanced banyan tree growth optimizer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ability to estimate the cost of software projects is critical to achieving project success, however, standard estimation methods fail on their promise due to the complicated relationships that exist within project data. This paper proposes a new hybrid approach that combines an Inception Network with Enhanced Banyan Tree Growth Optimizer (EBTGO) for improved accuracy. The Inception Network can capture hierarchical features better from the high-dimensional data set, while EBTGO optimizes hyperparameters to improve model performance. Our two benchmark dataset experiments, the Maxwell (1995) and COCOMO81 (Boehm, 1981) data sets, confirm that the hybrid model outperforms the state-of-the-art in each round of testing and across all evaluation metrics including Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Mean Magnitude of Relative Error (MMRE), and others. The statistical tests provide evidence that the added improvements are at least reasonably significant. The visual analyses, including receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and confusion matrices, reinforce that the model is robust. In addition, this paper demonstrates the limitations of traditional and machine learning approaches for estimation and shows the potential of deep learning and metaheuristic optimization for predicting software effort. Finally, this is an optimistic advancement toward predictive modeling in software engineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.