ArticleScientific reports2025
Enhancing breast magnetic resonance imaging segmentation with a federated semi-supervised approach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep learning technique boosts automatic segmentation on breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and assists diagnosis. However, training such deep learning models requires substantial annotated data, which is resource-intensive. This is particularly difficult to achieve for a single medical institution, especially some small ones. To this end, we proposed a federated semi-supervised learning framework for automated segmentation on breast MRI images, to maximize resource utilization of individual and collaborative institutions while preserving privacy. Specifically, each participant trains its own deep learning model locally and uploads it to the server for aggregation. For each participant's local training, we perform multiple perturbations on the unannotated samples and the extracted features for enhancing model robustness and generalization, and design a loss function to jointly optimize the model's performance on both annotated and unannotated data. Our experiments across three hospitals demonstrated that our proposed method achieved superior performance, with a Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) of 94.8% and an Intersection over Union (IoU) of 86.6%, outperforming existing models by up to 8.8% and 12% respectively in breast MRI segmentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.