Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41345416›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Wave masking enhances electrocardiogram reconstruction with linear regression.

Ekenedirichukwu N Obianom, Noor Qaqos, Shamsu Idris Abdullahi, G André Ng, Xin Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ekenedirichukwu N ObianomDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK. eno3@leicester.ac.uk.
Noor QaqosSchool of Engineering, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Shamsu Idris AbdullahiSchool of Engineering, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
G André NgDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Xin LiSchool of Engineering, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrocardiogram (ECG) reconstruction involves synthesizing leads from a reduced or alternative lead set. While ECG leads are generally considered linearly related, recording distortions and individual differences make perfect replication difficult, leading researchers to explore deep learning (DL) methods. This paper challenges DL methods by introducing wave masking, a novel preprocessing technique adapted from image recognition, where sections of the input are masked to highlight segments most relevant to improving reconstruction. Applied to ECG, it emphasizes key parts of the time-series signal. The study compares the performance of wave masking combined with linear regression against traditional preprocessing for both linear and DL models, using 10,000 normal ECG records from the CODE-15% database (trimmed to 10 s, resampled to 500 Hz, and denoised). Results show mean correlation values of 0.869 ± 0.201 for the linear pipeline, 0.880 ± 0.190 for the wave masking pipeline, and 0.894 ± 0.168 for the DL pipeline. Wave masking significantly improves linear regression performance by over 0.01 and produces results comparable to DL models, though not superior. These findings highlight wave masking as a promising, low computation preprocessing step for ECG reconstruction. Further research is needed to explore its potential benefits when integrated with deep learning models and diverse demographic records.

Indexed as

ElectrocardiographySignal Processing, Computer-AssistedAlgorithmsDeep LearningHumansLinear ModelsCorrelationDeep learningECGMachine learningReconstructionRegression

Identifiers

PMID41345416
PMCPMC12678528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.